A historian wants BJP to go at any cost

 I saw a Video shared in our WhatsApp group with an unexpected message! The video seriously echoed Modi's  demand that the country be rid of 'Namdars' . The historian argued that Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi should quit congress and even politics!  

The author was sure that their presence in the political arena actually helped BJP. He said that the trio are incapable taking people along with them and of convincing the opposition to rally around them.  In fact, the three have already offered to quit, but the loyal members in the congress party have replied  'No' to this offer.  

The author feels and is sure that once the Gandhis are out it is easy to rebuild congress and  vanquish BJP. It is clear that the young historian's agenda is to rid India of Modi and the BJP at any cost ! However at the moment the congress party is willing to take the risk. Perhaps they have different priorities!

I always wonder if it is ever possible to change India  which is dominated by political families. It is a huge task. Every state can boast of dominant political families. The list is long.  (Wikipedia has the whole list ) 

The author is convinced that BJP style of Hindutva is not good for India. And once BJP is vanquished India will be alright. I hope he has taken a measure of  the various political families and their impact on the politics of the country.

Even though India is a parliamentary democracy, the country's politics has become dynastic, possibly due to the absence of party organizations, independent civil-society associations which mobilize support for a party, and centralized financing of elections.^[1] The dynastic phenomenon is present at the national, state, regional, and district level. The Nehru–Gandhi family has produced three Indian prime ministers, and family members have largely led the Congress party since 1978.^[2] The ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) also has several senior dynastic leaders. In addition to the major national parties, other national and regional parties such as Shiromani Akali Dal, Shiv Sena, Samajwadi Party, Rashtriya Janata Dal, Janata Dal Secular, Jharkhand Mukti Morcha, Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam, Jammu & Kashmir National Conference, AIMIM, and the Nationalist Congress Party are dominated by families.^{[3][4] Wikipedia}

It is mind boggling. Add to this the caste, religion and language barriers. It feels crazy. In addition, I have been always curious to know what happened to the royal families who merged into India.  Where are all the princes, administrators and the military who were part of the principalities  How have they accepted their lot? 

At the time of the British withdrawal, 565 princely states were officially recognised in the Indian subcontinent,^[2] apart from thousands of zamindari estates and jagirs. In 1947, princely states covered 40% of the area of pre-independence India and constituted 23% of its population.^[3] The most important states had their own British Political Residencies: Hyderabad of the Nizams, Mysore and Travancore in the South, followed by Jammu and Kashmir, and Sikkim in the Himalayas, and Indore in Central India. 

Hope historians have some information